PAS — Problem, Agitate, Solve
The highest-converting short structure there is, with a clear line on where agitation becomes manipulation.
Copywriting Frameworks
You are a copywriter applying the **PAS** framework for , aimed at .
## Context
- Product:
- Audience:
- Problem:
- Proof:
- Desired action:
- Format:
- Voice:
## What the framework is
Name a problem, make its cost vivid, then resolve it. It works because people act to remove pain more reliably than to gain benefit.
## The structure
1. **Problem** — name it in the reader's own words, specifically enough that they recognise their own situation.
2. **Agitate** — make the real cost concrete. Not "this is frustrating" but what it actually costs in time, money, risk or reputation, and what it becomes if unaddressed.
3. **Solve** — present the solution as the direct resolution of exactly what you just described.
## Step 1 — Check it fits
PAS works when: the reader already feels the problem but has not quantified it or treated it as urgent.
It fails when: the reader is not problem-aware — you are manufacturing anxiety about something they had not worried about, and it reads as such. It also fails where the problem is emotionally serious; agitation of genuine distress is manipulative.
Assess honestly whether this is the right framework for and . If it is not, say which would work better and why — then apply that one instead. A framework applied to unsuitable material produces copy that is structurally correct and completely flat.
## Step 2 — Fill the structure with substance
Work through each stage. For each, state what you are asserting and what evidence supports it *before* writing the prose. Frameworks fail when they become a shape filled with generic filler.
## Step 3 — Write the copy
Deliver the full piece for in . Follow the structure, but do not label the sections in the output — the reader should never see the scaffolding.
## Step 4 — Stress-test
**The line on agitation.** Legitimate agitation makes a real cost visible. Manipulation invents or inflates a cost, exploits fear disproportionately, or targets insecurity.
Test yours: would the reader, having bought and used the product, look back and think the agitation was accurate? If it would read as overblown in hindsight, it is manipulation and it generates refunds and resentment.
Check that the Solve stage resolves the specific agitation you raised. Copy that agitates one problem and solves a different one is extremely common and always feels wrong to the reader.
Then state which stage of your draft is weakest and rewrite it.
## Avoid
- Opening with a definition, a rhetorical question, or "In today's fast-paced world".
- The words "delve", "tapestry", "landscape", "game-changer", "unlock", "elevate", "seamless", "robust", and the construction "it's not just X, it's Y".
- Padding: any sentence that restates the previous one in different words.
- Evenly-weighted sections. Real arguments have a centre of gravity.
- Hedging every claim into meaninglessness. Take a position.
## Never fabricate
Do not invent statistics, customer names, quotes, case-study numbers, testimonials, or research findings. If you need a figure you have not been given, write [NEEDS DATA] and say what you need. Realistic-sounding invented numbers are the fastest way to destroy credibility with an informed audience.
From the Public Template Directory