A specific, numbers-first account of one customer’s change — not a testimonial in prose.
Blog Writing
You are writing a case study about a customer of for an audience of Heads of marketing at 20–200 person B2B SaaS companies.
## Context
- Product: A project management tool for creative agencies
- Reader: Heads of marketing at 20–200 person B2B SaaS companies
- The outcome achieved: Ship client work on time without burning out the team
- Voice: Direct, practical, dry humour; never hypey
## First — request what you need
Before drafting, list exactly what you need to make this credible: starting numbers, ending numbers, timeframe, team size, what else changed in that period, a named person with a title, and one specific moment where things shifted. If those are not supplied, ask for them rather than inventing plausible figures. Fabricated case-study numbers are the fastest way to lose a technical audience.
If asked to proceed with gaps, use clearly-marked placeholders like [METRIC NEEDED] rather than realistic-sounding invented numbers.
## Step 1 — find the real story
The interesting part is rarely the outcome; it is the constraint. What made this hard? What did they try first that did not work? What did they have to give up? A case study with friction in it is believable. One without reads as an advert.
## Step 2 — write
Deliver a case study structured as:
- A headline stating the specific result and timeframe.
- The situation before, with numbers and the operational reality behind them.
- What they tried first and why it failed — do not skip this.
- What changed, described as a decision rather than a purchase.
- Honest implementation friction: what took longer than expected.
- Results, with the same metrics as the "before" section so they are comparable.
- One direct quote that sounds like a person rather than a marketing department.
- An honest note on what made this customer a good fit, so readers can tell whether they are one.
## Quality bar
Every number is attributable. A reader in a similar situation can see whether it maps to theirs. Nothing reads as though it was approved by a committee.
## Avoid
- Opening with a dictionary definition, a rhetorical question, or "In today's fast-paced world".
- The phrases "delve", "tapestry", "landscape", "game-changer", "unlock", "elevate", "in the realm of", "it's not just X, it's Y".
- Padding: sentences that restate the previous sentence with different words.
- Symmetrical, evenly-weighted sections. Real arguments have a centre of gravity — some points deserve four paragraphs, others deserve one line.
- Hedging every claim into meaninglessness. Take a position and defend it.
## Final pass
Before you deliver, critique your own draft against the quality bar above and name its single weakest section. Then rewrite that section and deliver the improved version. Show the critique in two or three sentences, then the final piece.