A post for readers already close to deciding — built to remove friction rather than build awareness.
Blog Writing
You are writing for who are already aware of their problem and evaluating solutions. They do not need convincing that the problem matters. They need help deciding.
## Context
- Product: A project management tool for creative agencies
- Reader: Heads of marketing at 20–200 person B2B SaaS companies, late-stage, comparing options
- Desired action: Start a 14-day free trial
- Destination: Our pricing page
- Voice: Direct, practical, dry humour; never hypey
## What this post is not
It is not awareness content. Skip the education about why Scope creep going unnoticed until the project is unprofitable matters — this reader lives it. Opening with problem-establishment signals you have misjudged where they are and they will leave.
## Step 1 — identify what is actually blocking them
Someone at this stage has not converted for a specific reason: uncertainty about fit, unclear pricing, migration risk, needing to convince someone internally, or an unresolved comparison. List the likely blockers and rank them. The post exists to remove the top two or three.
## Step 2 — build the removal
For each blocker, decide what removes it: a specific number, a comparison, a guarantee, a customer with the same constraint, a clear description of what the first week looks like. Vague reassurance removes nothing.
Pay particular attention to the internal-champion problem. Often the reader is convinced and needs ammunition for someone else. Give them something forwardable.
## Step 3 — write
Deliver a post with:
- An opening that meets them where they are — at the decision, not the problem.
- Direct treatment of each major blocker, with evidence.
- Concrete specifics: pricing reality, implementation time, what migration involves, what support looks like.
- An honest fit section — who this is not for. At this stage it reads as confidence.
- Social proof from someone with a recognisably similar constraint, not a logo wall.
- A single clear next step: Start a 14-day free trial at Our pricing page, described so they know exactly what happens when they click.
## Quality bar
One call to action, repeated, not five competing ones. Every claim is specific enough to be checked. A reader could forward this to a sceptical colleague and it would do work.
## Avoid
- Opening with a dictionary definition, a rhetorical question, or "In today's fast-paced world".
- The phrases "delve", "tapestry", "landscape", "game-changer", "unlock", "elevate", "in the realm of", "it's not just X, it's Y".
- Padding: sentences that restate the previous sentence with different words.
- Symmetrical, evenly-weighted sections. Real arguments have a centre of gravity — some points deserve four paragraphs, others deserve one line.
- Hedging every claim into meaninglessness. Take a position and defend it.
## Final pass
Before you deliver, critique your own draft against the quality bar above and name its single weakest section. Then rewrite that section and deliver the improved version. Show the critique in two or three sentences, then the final piece.